Cultivating Black Futures in the Museum Space: A Methodology
Aisha Shillingford & Terry Marshall
Artistic Director & Creative Director/Founder (respectively),
Intelligent Mischief

We created a design methodology whereby museums can repair their relationships with communities of color, support collective healing, and leverage their many resources to cultivate radical collective imagination toward beautiful futures grounded in Black liberation.

At the intersection of community organizing, speculative design, and world-building, the goal of our process is to bring together members of the community to collectively imagine and begin to cocreate the future of their neighborhoods, using the space and resources of the museum.

Outcomes include:

  • A collective vision for an anti-racist future of neighborhoods and cities
  • Deepened connections between city residents and the museum
  • Communities seeing museums as spaces for collaboration and imagination, and feel a sense of shared ownership
  • Comprehensive strategies for implementing the vision of the future
  • Prototypes and/or artifacts that make the vision tangible and actionable

Neil Ramsay, Assistant Teaching Professor at Florida International University; Amanda Covach, Curator of Education at MoCA North Miami; Kelsa Trom, former Associate Director of Programs at NEW INC; and Stephanie Pereira, former Executive Director at NEW INC.


  • R&D
  • Public programs
  • User-generated content
  • Open-Source
  • DEIA (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Accessibility)
  • Capacity building
  • Prototype
  • Social impact
  • Audience engagement
  • 3-6 months
  • $0-$10k
  • Grant

Briefly describe your project’s timeline and development.

We began by establishing a relationship with the museum to understand the needs and constraints of museums that are attempting to engage communities of color—especially those situated in majority-Black communities such as North Miami. Through several conversations, we understood that the core need of the museum was to engage community members using appropriate technology and by removing the barriers to entry to the museum building.

Our initial intention was to develop the methodology and collaborate with the museum to engage community using virtual means such as Zoom, AR, interactive web, etc. We soon realized that remote engagement of the community would be challenging since the surrounding community does not have widespread access to Wi-Fi, data, or equipment. Based on the needs and circumstances of the museum and the community we adapted the methodology for an appropriate technology implementation that could be used by a museum after COVID. We plan to partner with FIU to implement the methodology in the future and partner with the museum to showcase our findings. We understand what transpired to be a common equity issue whereby technological platforms are used for engagement without taking into consideration the realities of the communities that are already marginalized from the museum experience. This left us with the question, "How can a museum engage communities of color and poor communities across the digital divide?"

What do you think went really well?

The best part of this project was partnering with Professor Ramsay to understand the landscape and the constraints of the museum, and then adapting the process to use appropriate technology. Through this, we realized that even our design research must be adapted and tailored to the realities of communities.

What were the outcomes?

Since our project was mostly the development of a methodology, we don't have any concrete outcomes to share at this time, but we do hope to be able to share audience engagement metrics as well as audience reactions to prototypes, etc.

What was most helpful in pulling this project off?

Partnership with Neil Ramsay and guidance from Kelsa Trom and Stephanie Pereira.

Based on your experience, what advice do you have to share?

Museums are often ill-equiped to engage underresourced communities. A focus on technology often deepens the disparity experienced by communities of color and poor communities. How do museums truly become places where all people can make meaning of the past to shape the future? How do museums themselves become a truly public resource for catalyzing public imagination? We encourage the use of appropriate technology that is tailored to the needs and experiences of communities and not just the desire to experiment amongst technologists. Technology is an equity issue. Culture is an equity issue. The future is an equity issue. Imagination is an equity issue.

Do you plan to continue this project?

We absolutely plan to continue this project. We will be collaborating with Professor Ramsay at FIU to develop appropriate means for data collection, community engagement, design research, and prototype development within the community of North Miami.


This case study was generously contributed by
Aisha Shillingford & Terry Marshall
Artistic Director & Creative Director/Founder (respectively),
Intelligent Mischief
10 people found this case study helpful.
I found this Case Study Helpful

Would you like to share your insights on a project you worked on?